Victorian Historiography and the Image of China
Author : Shu Yunzhong
Keywords : (self-)image, stationary stagnation, ahistory, Taoist, (historical) goal, inaction, historiography, distortion (of image), transformation, St.-Simonism: critical/organic periods
DOI :
This essay discusses the image of China in 19th-century England, seen as a function of the changing values and emphases in Victorian historiography. The dominant image of China, perhaps of all Asia, is one of stagnation and “ahistory"--an image based at least in part on ignorance, and one which can have both positive and negative meanings, depending on the point of view of the beholder. Thinkers
like Carlyle and Mill were influenced by St.-Simon’s theory that history alternates between "critical" and “organic” periods: Carlyle, longing for the final "golden age" of an organic society in England, admired China for its rule by intellectual elite, a sign of the rational, government—imposed order and harmony of the organic stage; Mill, on the other hand, valued individual liberty above social order, and thought history may not be after all progressing (as in Carlyle’s Hegelian thinking) toward a final goal. In Ruskin’s (pro-Western) negative view of Chinese popular art and Wilde’s (anti-conventional) attraction to Taoist "inaction," we find again that the British images of China are really self-images, conditioned by the changing social, philosophical and historiographical ideas and values of 19th-century British Society.